Ok, let’s clear a few things up:
1. The Canadiens are mired in their worst season since 2000-01 when they swapped Alain Vigneault (5-13-2-0) for Michel Therrien (23-27-6-6). After 43 games the Canadiens were 12-25-4-2, at the same point in this season the Canadiens are 16-20-7. Four more wins. That Canadiens team was a very bad team. Lots of underachievers and castoffs like Martin Rucinsky, Patrick Poulin, Chad Kilger and Trevor Linden. One of the bright spots was Saku Koivu’s 47 points in 54 games that tied him with Oleg Petrov for the team lead. Petrov played in an astounding 82 games that season. Markov with 23 points in 63 games was also a source of hope. But make no bones about it, that team was terrible. Just as is this current edition of the Canadiens is terrible.
The Canadiens haven’t fallen from grace, they’ve been a mediocre team in the NHL for a long time. In 20 years, they’ve finished first in their division just twice. They have had some bright spots – 2007-08, 2009-10, 1992-93, but they have never put together a stretch of years where they were an elite team. I find it laughable to see fans of my age mourn how far this team has fallen from its once honoured status as if it’s a new development. It isn’t.
2. Mike Cammalleri had a limited no movement clause. There seems to be criticism that Cammalleri wasn’t shopped around the league and that Gauthier could have received better market value than he did. I have no idea whether that speculation is founded or not, but Cammalleri’s limited no movement clause meant that the teams Gauthier could deal with were, well, limited.
3. Players like Cammalleri were offensively shackled under Jacques Martin and everyone’s production was down while JM was the coach. Benoit Pouliot, James Wisniewski and Tomas Plekanec all enjoyed career years under Martin. Gionta’s goal scoring, which was on a 3 season decline after his monster 48 goal season, improved. He recorded the second highest points per game mark (.75) in his career in his first season with the Habs. Cammalleri had a 13 goal playoff for the Habs.
Pouliot’s 2009-10 was a breakout year for him, he recorded a .62 ppg in 39 games for the Habs, his 2010-11 season was a bit of a regression. I have read a few comments praising Pouliot’s play with the Bruins this year, but with the same amount of ice time in Boston (11:32 per game) as he had in Montreal last year, Pouliot is still only collecting points at .43 clip, up .05 from 2010-11. It’s not that big of a revelation.
Martin favored a defensive approach, obviously, but not every player suffered offensively under Martin. Gomez has been in a downward spiral since before coming to the Habs, Kostitsyn has pretty much found a pace (.55-.56 ppg) since the end of 2007-08 that he’s happy with and has settled there – regardless of who is coaching, Pacioretty has shown about the same production regardless of coach and Cole and Eller have improved under Cunneyworth. In my opinion it’s pretty split when it comes to the top offensive forwards, some (like Gionta) responded well to Martin, some (like Kostitsyn) gave about the same and others had their ups and downs (Cammalleri).
4. The trade. The Habs cleared nearly 3 million from their payroll, they shipped out a player who was probably never going to play for them (Karri Ramo) and they upgraded a fifth round pick to a second.
It’s not a bad haul. I don’t care how Gauthier went about it and I don’t care what comments Cammalleri made before the trade. Of course they are factors, but looking at it purely from how this impacts assets and economics, the Canadiens did ok.
Bourque’s production over the last two+ seasons is comparable to Cammalleri’s; Bourque has 67 goals in 191 games-roughly .35 goals per game while Cammalleri has 54 goals in 170 games-roughly .32 goals per game.
Looking at pure numbers, it’s a fair trade. The Canadiens get bigger, pick up a second round pick and a prospect, Patrick Holland, who has a shot at being a useful 3rd-4th liner (and he speaks French to boot), they give up a goalie that Jay Feaster drafted in Tampa Bay, a 5th rounder and a “name player” who has hit a rough patch.
I haven’t been the biggest fan of Cammalleri while he was with the Canadiens. I thought he had an amazing playoff and one decent season, but he never quite justified the contract the Canadiens awarded him. The Canadiens only really had one moveable monster/possible mistake contract and that was Cammalleri’s. They didn’t get a monster haul for him, but the trade, when looking purely at production and numbers, isn’t so bad.